Research Motivation

1. I am trying to learn about/study “cyberbullying”, which is bullying that takes place online.

2. I am trying to learn about/study “cyberbullying” because I want to find out when and how it started and why cyberbullying is so prominent in our society.

3. I am doing this in order to educate both parents and children about the dangers of the Internet and to prevent cyberbullying from taking place in the future.

Revision

Original

On the eve of my 16th birthday, I could barely sit still. In a mere few hours, I was going to embark on a whole new part of my life. I was going to learn how to drive. This birthday marked the beginning of the process to get my permit. Exactly one year later, I was excited beyond words. It was the eve of me getting my license. After a whole year of driving with stickler parents, I could almost taste the freedom I was about to possess. However a year after that, all excitement had gone out the window. On the eve of my 18th birthday, I couldn’t think of a single exciting freedom that this landmark age was about to give me. What did I have to look forward to, the ability to get arrested? No thank you. Had I lived in virtually any other country, I would have been able to go have a drink and celebrate with my friends. However the legal drinking age of 21 in the U.S. hindered this potential birthday celebration. I couldn’t help but question this law. If turning 18 made me eligible to do so many other things, why couldn’t I have a drink? Upon further thought, I came to a conclusion. The legal drinking age of 21 in the U.S. is unfair and should be lowered to 18.

Revised

On the eve of my 16th birthday, I could barely sit still. In a few hours, I was going to embark on a whole new part of my life. I was going to learn how to drive. This birthday marked the beginning of the process to get my permit. Exactly one year later, I was excited beyond words. It was the eve of me actually getting my license. After a whole year of driving with stickler parents, I could almost taste the freedom I was about to possess. However a year after that, all excitement had gone out the window. On the eve of my 18th birthday, I couldn’t think of a single exciting freedom that this landmark age was about to give me. What did I have to look forward to, the ability to get arrested? No thank you. Had I lived in virtually any other country, I would have been able to go have a drink and celebrate with my friends. Unfortunately, I live in the U.S. where the drinking age is 21. I couldn’t help but question this law. If turning 18 made me eligible to do so many other things, such as get a tattoo and live on my own, why couldn’t I have a drink? The legal drinking age of 21 in the U.S. is arbitrary and should be lowered to 18 because it is inconsistent with other laws, is not effective, and promotes dangerous drinking practices.

Religion Rules

I think that a good venue for my argument would be The Daily Collegian. This is because my argument, lowering the drinking age, is a topic that directly affects college students. I think that many Collegian readers would want to read an article about this. Therefore, upon getting this assignment, I decided to look in The Daily Collegian for an opinion piece.
I came across an article entitled “Preachers should show respect for others' beliefs” by Sam Kramer. This article discusses people, both on campus and off, pushing their religious beliefs on to other people. Examples used in this article include the Westboro Baptist Church, which is essentially a hate group, which protests things such as soldier’s funerals, and the Willard preacher. Kramer has an interesting take on this issue. While he completely supports the first amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech, he feels that there is a difference between exercising this freedom and being rude. He says that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and views but they should not judge others for not believing in the same things, nor should they try to convert them.
Kramer’s piece is organized very well, with convincing arguments. He starts out with explaining the first amendment and showing his support for it. He then uses the example of the Westboro Baptist church and the Willard preacher to set up what he is going to be arguing. This shows the reader exactly what he is talking about. He then goes on to say that he feels people push their rights when they try to force their beliefs down other’s throats. Kramer uses the example of “the golden rule” and how it is applied in elementary school yet not in religion. He then gives another example involving the Westboro Baptist Church protesting a Foo Fighters concert, which is very effective. He ends with saying that while all people are entitled to their own beliefs, they should not try to convince others to share their viewpoints.
I completely agree with Kramer. I am not religious at all, yet it seems as though I can’t go a mere day without overhearing some conversation about Jesus or some other religious jargon. All I want to do is sit in the Hub and enjoy my book, but I have to listen to a conversation about the rapture? No thank you. Not only does it disturb my peace and quiet, it makes me very uncomfortable. This article especially hit home for me because the Westboro Baptist Church came to my school last year to “protest”. It caused quite a stir, with them holding up signs that read “God Hates Fags” and “Thank God for 9/11” right outside of my English classroom. I feel that religion should be a personal thing that can be discussed in private with friends, but not in a public setting. I also feel that people should not try to convert people to other beliefs.
I really liked the fact that Kramer used powerful examples such as the Westboro Baptist Church to show that his argument has substance. I also liked that he embraced the other side, freedom of speech, but said that a line needed to be drawn. I wasn’t crazy about his frequent use of one sentence paragraphs. In my own piece, I will try to incorporate effective examples like Kramer did. I will also maybe try to use a sarcastic tone, like the author did in the end about the rapture coming up. Overall, I thought this was a successful piece.

http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2011/09/28/preachers_should_show_respect_for_others_beliefs.aspx

Argument Ideas

Jackson, Lucas. "States Weigh Lowering Drinking Age." usatoday.com. N.p., 1 Apr. 2008. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/ 2008-03-20-drinkingage_N.htm.

The issue discussed in this article is whether or not the current drinking age of 21 should be lowered. Many feel that it should be 18 because in America, when you are 18 you can fight in the war, get a tattoo, and live on your own, however you can’t drink. others feel that lowering the drinking age would increase alcohol related deaths, including driving incidents. I feel that the drinking age should absolutely be lowered. It is ridiculous that you can die in combat but can’t have a beer at a bar while watching a football game. I plan to use this topic for my argument.



"Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and Domestic Partnerships." newyorktimes.com. N.p., 25 Aug. 2011. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/ same_sex_marriage/index.html.

The issue concerning this article is gay marriage. It states how in recent years, the gay marriage debate has been heavily focused upon. Several states have leagalized gay marriage and recently, Don’t Ask, Don”t Tell was repealed. I think that gay marriage should absolutely be legal. If two people love each other, why not? It is not fair for gay people to be told who they are allowed to love. I think that gay marriage is frowned upon by conservatives who are stuck in older times. If people were always this close-minded, we would probably still have slavery. This controversy is one that gets me very angry.



"Marijuana and Medical Marijuana." newyorktimes.com. N.p., 13 Oct. 2011. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/ m/marijuana/index.html.

This article debates the issue of legalizing marijuana. 15 states and D.C. have legalized medical marijuana. However many citizens believe that all types, not just medical, marijuana should be legalized. Personally, I think it should be legalized. If cigarettes, the number one cancer causers, are legal, why isn’t marijuana? The government could tax it, as they do with cigarettes, and make tons of money. Alcohol has the same kind of effects and that is legal, so marijuana should be legalized.



*note: lionsearch did not let me view the online articles, so I used articles I found on Google.

Shoe Structure

All shoes have pretty much the same function; to provide feet protection, warmth, and support. However there are countless different styles and designs of shoes. In fact if you were to go on the street, it is highly likely that everyone has a different pair. How does one pick what shoes to wear when there are so many options? Is it due to style, comfort, warmth, or a mixture of all three? I decided to review the design of shoes that have the same function but very different appearances; an UGG boot and a high heel.

UGG Boot: Perhaps the first thing I notice when looking at an UGG boot is how flat the sole is. There is virtually no arch at all. In fact, the design overall looks like the type of shoe that one might draw on a stick figure. The design is very simple. Aside from the flat sole, there is a rounded toe. There is a slight curve up until the first seam is reached. Then the shoe is designed to cover the wearer’s calf. The calf is approximately 10 inches long. The boot is practically straight from the heel to the back of the calf. UGG boots are made of sheep skin. If you rubbed the boot, you would be able to see the change in direction on the surface. The seams are emphasized with visible piping and stitching. The bottom of the shoe is made of a rubbery material with a carved out design on the bottom. The inside of the shoe is a totally different material. The entire boot, including the foot part and the calf, is lined with fur. In this case, this fur is cream colored. The outside color is best described as “chestnut”. Finally, there is a tag on the heel, revealing the brand of the shoe.

High Heel: Unlike the UGG, the high heel has a very prominent arch. The ball of the shoe is flat but gradually curves up along the instep. At the heel, the arch abruptly curves back down, helping to form a thick heel of about three inches. The heel is narrowest at the ground and gets thicker as it gets closer to where the foot is placed. The heels are made of black suede, with a rubber bottom. Like the UGG, there is a design carved out on the bottom of the rubber. The top of the shoe almost appears to be made of two separate strips of suede, meeting together at the back. In the front of the shoe, these two strips cross over each other, forming an X like shape. This leaves the toe of the shoe open. This also leaves a medium sized open triangle on the side of the shoe. The suede fabric bunches to form a line in one of the strips of the X, giving the shoe more texture. There is a small black zipper at the heel of the shoe for ease of putting it on and taking it off. On the onside of the shoe, there is a foam-like material. This material is black like the rest of the shoe, making it virtually unnoticeable. The brand name is not visible during wear of the shoe, but is written on the inside of the heel in silver letters, standing out from the black inside.

Bridesmaids Breakdown

I decided to review the movie Bridesmaids. This movie is just one of several comedies produced by Judd Apatow including Knocked Up, Step Brothers, and Superbad. While Bridesmaids includes the same type of humor as these other Apatow movies, there is one key difference; the movie is centered around a female character. Bridesmaids surpassed expectations at the box office, making an estimated $32,500,000. This beat Apatow’s former most successful film Knocked Up. I waited a while to see it until I could not silence the burning question; what is all the hype over?
I decided to take a trip to the movie theater to find out. After 125 minutes I am to the conclusion; I wasn’t that impressed. As much as I wanted to rave over this film like many critics and friends had, I just couldn’t bring myself to do it. While yes, there were funny scenes, I couldn’t help but wish I was viewing Pineapple Express or Superbad instead. For some reason, it felt like I wasn’t watching the same movie that everybody else deemed so special. I couldn’t help but wondering; why is it just not doing it for me? I realized that this movie is a perfect thing to evaluate so that I can figure out what it is about this movie that makes it fizzle.
Bridesmaids can be put into several categories. Of course, it could be classified as a comedy. However it could be put into more specific classifications such as female comedies of Judd Apatow movies. There are hundreds of movies that it could be compared to if it was put in the category if “comedies”. If it was classified as a female comedy, Bridesmaids could be compared to movies such as Mean Girls, Romy and Michelle’s High School Reunion, and Bring It On. Of course, if the movie was put into the category of Judd Apatow movies, it could be compared to his movies mentioned above.
No matter which category Bridesmaids is put in, there are certain criteria that could be used to evaluate the movie. The first would be plot. In order for any genre of movie to be good, there has to be an interesting plot. Plot is often crucial in comedies as sometimes it can be stupid and unrealistic in funny movies. The second criteria that could be used to evaluate this movie would be how funny it is. This could be evaluated by the type of humor included in the movie or how many times it made the audience laugh. Another criterion could be the casting. The evaluator could ask, “were the characters portrayed by the right actors?” Along with casting comes the actual acting, which would be another benchmark for evaluation. The actors should make the humor seem effortless and realistic, not forced. Finally, a comedy could be evaluated on impact or overall expression. The evaluator could ask; did the movie keep me talking afterwards? Do I find myself wanting to watch it again? Am I going to recommend it to my friends? Bridesmaids has many criteria could be used to make an interesting and worthwhile evaluation.

Makeover Takeover

When I first created this blog in the beginning of the year, I was totally new to Blogger. I did not even know how to set up the design and layout of the page. At first I tried to set a Penn State background, but nothing seemed to work out. So I ended up using one of the preset templates. While I picked the one that most appealed to me, I am not crazy about it. I am not a pink girl at all, and I don’t particularly like birds. However I felt that this layout gave out a feminine yet sophisticated vibe. It even incorporated my favorite color, blue, in the headlines. As for the font, I think it is appropriate. Even though according to NFG, serif fonts are used for academic writings, I prefer sans serif type face. I feel that a blog is casual enough to have any font and I want my blog to reflect me and my preferences. I feel that my blog is appropriate for my English class because it is colorful and appealing without being obnoxious and over the top. I do wish that I could include more images in my blog. I feel the images spice up a page and make readers more interested in the content. However I find that with most of the blog assignments, images would not be appropriate. I hope to use more images in the future as I did with the Cady Herron cafeteria picture in the post about lunch. If I can figure out how, I would love to make my blog more reflective of my tastes.
After reevaluating my blog design, I made several changes. First I decided to change the template of my blog. I tried several but couldn’t find one that I liked. So instead I decided to change my background. At first I felt that I should upload my own image, but I couldn’t think of any that would describe me. I started going through the preloaded images and was feeling defeated. That was until I came across the ribbons background. I immediately knew this one was the right choice for my blog. I wanted a background that represented my style preferences. This ribbon background did just that. It was colorful, clean, and creative. After changing the background, I realized that the makeover was not yet complete. The text was boring and black. I decided to make it colorful. Instead of picking just one color for every post, I decided to make each post one of the colors of the ribbons in the background. A blog that inspired mine is Perez Hilton (http://perezhilton.com/). Another blog that I enjoy the design of is Hypable (http://www.hypable.com/). I feel that both sites use bright colors and bold headlines that make the blog look clean but colorful and interesting. I think both blogs use pictures very well and I love the color schemes of both. I wish that I knew how to use Blogger better and that my blog could be on the level of Perez Hilton and Hypable.

Investigative Reporting

1. It is 4:30 p.m. I have been dreading this time all day. I am sitting in Reddefor Commons, my eyes scanning the crowd, trying to not look desperate. It is not working. I have that semi-shaky-but-still-trying-to-hide-my-nerves vibe going on. I do another scan of the room. I see the box before I see the girl carrying it. My heart skips a beat. I do not take my eyes of my Pi Chi, aka my rush leader. Girls swarm her as soon as she puts the box down. However I remain calmly in my chair. I can wait a few more seconds to find out my fate. In fact, I plan on putting it off as long as possible. Then I hear my name. My Pi Chi has pulled out my slip. Fantastic. I slowly reach out and clutch the slim piece of paper between my sweaty fingers. I say a rapid prayer. I am not religious, but rush had seemed to have sparked the little bit of piety in me. Please let me see 6 sororities on that slip, please let me see 6 sororities on that slip. I feel like I am moving in slow motion. I unfold the slip. I see 3 names. 3 names that I didn’t even want to see. I feel my heart drop. It is official; I am dropping out of rush. I am not going to be in a sorority.

2. - “I didn’t get invited back to my first choice [sorority] and I expected to be invited back because I felt like I fit in and I had a family friend there.” –Taylor Beatty, 18, class of 2015

- “I got in an argument with a senior in the sorority the first week of college and she decided to hold it against me.” –Taylor Beatty, 18, class of 2015. On why she didn’t get invited back
- “Yes because I had friends in one and the other one I felt really comfortable and the conversations I had with the girls were really good and it just felt right.” –Sam Metz, 18, class of 2015, On if she expected to be invited back to a sorority that she didn’t get invited back to.

3. – “Any action or situation with or without consent which recklessly, intentionally or unintentionally endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or creates risk of injury, or causes discomfort, embarrassment, harassment or ridicule or which willfully destroys or removes public or private property for the purpose of initiation or admission into or affiliation with, or as a condition for continued membership in a chapter or colony of an National Panhellenic Conference member fraternity.” –Penn State Panhellenic Website

-“Many clubs and organizations at Penn State have yearly or semesterly dues to help pay for their events and activities for their members. Sororities are no different, with dues being used to pay for the upkeep of the chapter’s suite, community service events, scholarships, intramurals, and many of the social events offered. Annual membership dues vary per chapter, but an estimated range is anywhere from $350 to $600 each semester. During formal recruitment, chapters will disclose their financial expectations to potential new members before extending an invitation to join.” –Penn State Panhellenic Website

-11% of Penn State women join sororities –www.collegeboard.org

- 13% of Penn State men join fraternities –www.collegeboard.org

4. Upon doing my research about the rush process, I realized that I was asking another question along with it. Why do girls feel the need to join a sorority? Why is not getting into one worth crying over? I decided to ask these questions in my interview. Another question I decided I need to research further is what current sorority girls or girls who went through with rush feel like they have gotten out of being in a sorority and if they would go through the rush process again looking back on it. I also asked these questions in my interviews, which was very helpful and gave me a lot of insight into my topic.

Number 1 Lie

In 2009, Penn State was named the “Number 1 Party School”. The issue of the “This American Life” piece was to prove that the school deserves this title. It is not credible to just claim that Penn State is the biggest party school, there needs to be reasons, anecdotes, interviews, and statistics showing why the university was named this. While some may argue that the intended audience would be students or faculty of Penn State, I think that it is more for adults who are college graduates. Specifically ones that look down on drinking.
There were several details and stories provided to show how the issue affects different people related to the university. One of these anecdotes includes a resident of State College, whose yard is often filled with pizza plates and beer cans, and another resident who had to install motion detectors in their yard due to all of the incidents with drunken students that he had had. Perhaps the story dealing with a resident that resonated with me the most was the one where a male student was found in the bedroom of a young child after breaking into their house.
The report also includes perspectives from the students. Some of these perspectives include “frackets”, “the drunk bus”, getting into frats, football Saturdays, and risqué dresses for girls. It was also very interesting to hear the reporters follow a police officer in State College. Listeners were able to hear directly of 2 arrests made in one night, one for a fake ID and the other for public urination. It was a way to see into a typical night of a Penn State police officer.
Finally, the report included a powerful focus on the death of a student. There was many interviews of students and faculty about this incident. They also looked into the police reports. Students were asked if this death will cause them to stop drinking, and most said no. However the students said that this will cause them to be more careful and stay in a group when drinking.
There were several narrative techniques used in this report. These include anecdotes, sensory details, and firsthand accounts. The report also has a clear structure and organization. It is organized into four separate acts and an introduction. The narrative techniques used make the report interesting and easy to listen to. It does not lag or get boring or repetitive.
Personally, I did not like this report. I feel that is was made by a bunch of stuck up adults who try to act like they are above everyone. Except I guarantee that they drank in college. They could have gone to any college around the same size and nature (i.e. big football team, state school) and found the exact same things. The reason that they made Penn State look like the biggest party school was because they actually put forth the effort to investigate. The same level of partying and arrests and underages happen at colleges all across the country. They used terms that I, as a student, have never heard and clearly exaggerated certain aspects of party life such as the “slutty” outfits girls wear. Not all girls wear these outfits. You can often find girls in jeans and flats. Also, I have never even heard of the rule that only members of fraternities and sororities are allowed in the frat houses. I think that the reporters picked an angle before researching and used every piece of evidence that they could to prove it.

Writing Advice that Lasts a Lifetime

Before I started reading Bird by Bird, I thought it was going to be a boring and instructional book on how to write. I expected to almost be put to sleep by it, and skim it at best. But when I started reading it, I realized that I was not bored in the least bit. Yes, it was a book on how to write, but it was written in a way that made it interesting. Lamott didn’t simply lecture the audience on what they should do; she shared stories and anecdotes from her life and applied them to writing skills. She made me have a different perspective on writing, especially when it comes to writers block and the purpose of writing.
However the part of the book that sticks out the most to me is the chapter entitled “Shitty First Drafts”. Instead of taking the normal approach towards unappealing writing, Lamott says to embrace it. According to her, the shitty first draft is something that you have to deal with in order to make any progress. Like “gen eds” you have to complete them to get to the good stuff or the stuff that you care about. In a sense, these drafts are like a rite of passage. I think that this advice will stick with me for the rest of my writing career. Whenever I start writing something that I don’t like or that just isn’t working, I get frustrated. I often want to give up or toss the idea or approach away. But now I realize I will just have to think of these less-than-brilliant drafts as a gateway to my final masterpiece. Lamott says that while most of your first drafts are “shitty”, there is some material in there, even if it is just a sentence or phrase, that is worth running with. It’s as if you have to write 1000 words in order to get about 30 good ones. But once you have those 30 inspired words, the rest of your piece will flow right along. The other 970 were just there to guide you along.
I think that the concept of shitty first drafts can be applied to other aspects of life. One aspect for example would be in the working world. You have to have some degrading jobs (i.e. doing monotonous work in a law office for hours at a time) in order to work your way up to the job of your dreams. Shitty first drafts also apply to finding true friends. You won’t know what a true friend looks like until you’ve had some shitty ones. I think that this principle will cause me to not be so critical of myself or my situations. For example, college has been a hard adjustment. But if I think in Lamott’s terms, I can label this the “shitty first months”, make some friends, join some clubs, and go on to have an amazing college experience. I love that this book gave me advice that I can use in both my writing and my life.

"Confessions of a Bad Teacher"

I recently read “Confessions of a Bad Teacher” by John Owens, which was featured in Salon. I found that as I was reading it, it didn’t feel like I was reading for a school assignment, but rather for enjoyment. The story flowed very well and kept me interested. I think this has to do with how it incorporated the key parts of a memoir. “Confessions of a Bad Teacher” is about how Owens decided to go from being a writer and publisher to being a teacher. A teacher in a bad area, nonetheless. The story tells us about the troubles he faced, such as kids not wanting to learn, administrators who didn’t care, and trying to discipline difficult students.
The conflict of the story is between Owens, who wants so badly to teach and help these students, and the students who would rather do anything than learn and behave. Owens shows the audience the conflict through many examples, such as trying to hold the students hostage for an extra ten minutes, or being called a pervert for trying to get a student to put her cell phone away. The resolution of this memoir ends up being that Owens quits, or is let go, after receiving a “U”. Even though he quit and it seemed like he failed, at the end his students told him what an influence he had on their lives and how they didn’t want him to leave. There are actually several morals to this story. One is that one does not always realize the affect that they have on someone else’s life. Owens thought that he was a failure of a teacher who didn’t even deserve to teach anymore, when in reality the students confessed that he taught some of them more than anyone else ever had. This story also teaches to not go by the normal definition of “right” and “wrong” when it comes to teaching and discipline. Even though some of his methods were unconventional, i.e. singing the Star Spangled Banner very loudly, they still worked. Finally, this memoir shows that even if you technically “fail”, in this case by getting a “U”, its all how you look at it. Yes, Owens ended up leaving the school, but he left a lasting impression on his students’ lives. This story is relevant to the times because a lot of the public school systems in urban areas are overlooked. There are many problems with the administrators, teachers, students, and parents. Many officials tend to turn the other way and pretend these problems don’t exist so that they don’t have to deal with it. “Confessions of a Bad Teacher” exposes these problems in a way that will make readers want to be informed. This story could potentially spark a change. The intended audience for this story would be aspiring teachers, current teachers, or administrators. It could teach them many new things or encourage them to rethink their old ways.
I think that a narrative technique that was used well in this story was characterization. Owens provides strong details and dialogue so that the reader can truly visualize the students. Owens also has a very strong voice, and it is as if you could almost hear him telling you the story. He also uses subheads to transition between time and different subjects. I think that “Confessions of a Bad Teacher” was a well-written memoir.

The Lunch Table Games

The concept seems simple enough. You go to the commons, or the cafeteria, or the break room at work. You grab your lunch, you sit down, and you eat. Right? Wrong. Lunch may seem like just another meal, but it actually represents the epitome of social status. Where you sit and who you sit with at lunch affect more than just your lunch break. It determines your social status. This may sound like a bad 90’s high school sitcom (i.e. Full House); however the truth in the statement is overwhelming.
Take the first day of school for instance. This is basically when you determine who you are going to be for the following year. You emerge from the lunch line, tray topped with a chicken wrap and a bottle of water in hand. You start out hopeful, but as you scan the room, your eyes quickly fill with desperation. You look everywhere for a friend. No luck. You look for a familiar face. Nothing. Soon the panic begins to set in. Am I going to have to sit by myself? Or even worse, with the band geeks?
You weigh the options. Looking around, you realize there aren’t many. You could sit with the theater kids, but you wouldn’t have much to talk about. You question the jocks, but you don’t want to be stuck in the middle of guy talk. After all, you want to eat lunch, not lose your appetite. Maybe your friend Jenny. Except you haven’t talked to her since 5th grade, so unless she still collects Bratz Dolls, that would be a pretty dull conversation.
Listen to yourself, you sound ridiculous, you think. But deep down, you know that where you sit does matter. Not only do you want to sit with your friends to have an enjoyable lunch period, there are also underlying factors which make your choice of table so important.
Take gossip for instance. If you don’t sit with Ashley and Rebecca, how are you going to find out what girl Mike is talking to? That’s right; you don’t. Your lunch table also often determines your weekend plans. The two may not seem related, but consider this. You and your girls are discussing last week’s gossip girl over Caesar salads. Chase, an upperclassman, walks up to your table to tell Ashley about the party he is having that night. He glances around the table and extends an invitation to all members present. Had you sat with the artsy kids that day, you would have ended up sitting home playing solitaire on your computer that night.
Where you sit at lunch also provides group association. While you may be very aware that you are friends with Michelle, everyone else in the cafeteria may not be. That is until you eat lunch together. Or people may not realize that your older brother is a senior and you’re friendly with all of his teammates until you share a sandwich with them.
You’re about to walk out of the lunch room and into the bathroom to eat your lunch alone, when you spot Rebecca walking in. Relief washes over you and the weight of the pressure, and your lunch tray, seems to have been lifted. Rebecca waves and begins to walk over, pulling out a chair.
Phew, that was a close one.

My Inner Carrie Bradshaw

Even though not everyone enjoys it, everyone is a writer. Before you jump to correct me, think about it. Nearly every single person has written something in their lives. I’m not saying that everyone is a columnist, an author, or a poet. But everyone has experience with rhetoric writing. You may not consider writing a to-do list to yourself rhetoric writing, but a simple list contains all of the elements of rhetoric writing. Now if someone asked me if I was a writer, my first instinct would be to say no. When I hear the word “writer”, I imagine someone at a desk with a pencil in their mouth or an artsy girl in a coffee shop on her laptop writing to make money. But when I stop to think about it more, I realize I am in fact a writer. I write every day, whether it be a list, a Facebook post, my homework in my planner, or a tweet. Just because I am not getting paid for it or because it is not my occupation, does not mean that I’m not a writer.
In fact, I have always enjoyed writing. A particular strong point of my writing is my ability to make things sarcastic and humorous. I’ve been told that my writing is easy to read, and people often laugh when they read it. However my wit usually only occurs when I am writing about something I am passionate about and I am familiar with. Which brings me to one of my weaknesses as a writer; if I am not very interested in the topic, I have a hard time channeling the skills that I have when I am writing with enthusiasm. I am afraid that sometimes when writing academic papers, I sound like a textbook. There is also a part of my writing process that I consider both a strength and a weakness. I do not like people editing my writing. I know what you may say, constructive criticism is key when it comes to writing. But I am not very open to suggestion. This can sometimes be a disadvantage when say, a teacher tells me I should do a certain thing and I do not listen. However I think it is more of a strength. I am not saying that I am against any advice and will not comply to any suggestions. But when I get a gut feeling about the way something should be said or presented in my writing, I stick to it. No one can help you get out your thoughts as much as you can. I think that this principle helps me maintain my voice as a writer.
Even though I am not an English or journalism major, I sometimes feel the urge to write down my thoughts and stories. Particularly when I watch Sex and the City.
http://.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/6f3780d88e8eeaa2_carrie-bradshaw-mac2.jpg
I am hoping that this class and blog will help me channel my inner Carrie Bradshaw (both the writing aspect and the shoes). I am also inspired to write by one of my favorite movies about a young journalist touring with a band called Almost Famous. I love the way the main character does not stop until he gets an interview and all of the adventures his writing brings him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0XnyrENrE